Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ujawal Jha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎. Solves to the deletion !votes and because the creator is amenable and willing to do the work. Star Mississippi 02:33, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ujawal Jha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced that there is enough independent coverage here to establish notability Sources read like promo pieces/advertorials. Previously draftified [1] KH-1 (talk) 02:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Nepal. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:51, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The Sun piece seems iffy, feels PRish and is only half a page long; the "person" that wrote it doesn't even capitalize their name. Not sure why Nigerians are concerned about a routine individual in Nepal, but it's what it is... Oaktree b (talk) 13:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
keep: The signing of social worker bill into law by the Nigerian former president and Ujawal Jha offering a helping service to the country ought to be the reason he has such coverage see
reports have it that he plans to focused on developing initiatives that empower individuals to overcome challenges independently in Nigeria.
— https://thenationonlineng.net/buhari-lauded-for-signing-social-work-bill/
Wasilatlovekesy (talk) 14:52, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- No independent sourcing. No specifics on what he's supposed to have done. All I've learnt from reading the article is that you can pay Nigerian sources considered generally reliable (by at least one of our scripts) to publish biographies with not even a pretense of objectivity. It does not help that a Nepali social worker has more coverage in Nigeria than in any other country, Nepal included. All the sources are parroting the same thing too. Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems new prince has born in Nigeria. nirmal (talk) 04:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
keep: It’s a decent enough page. Relevant citations and notable subject. Because it isn’t “mainstream” doesn’t mean the subject lacks credibility. Amaekuma (talk) 18:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not impressed by the souces I looked at. Often no byline, several referred to him as "she" so they couldn't keep his gender straight and the content was mostly vague goals he had and few details on what he has actually accomplished in his short life that might make him notable. It's great that he wants to help people and empower women but many people do and they do not have articles on Wikipedia. Also, the page creator cut and paste this article in main space so there is still an existing draft at Draft:Ujawal Jha. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG, as others have noted above, standing up a Nepalese person's article with Nigerian paid puff placements is not only odd, it's pointless. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:24, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- These sources are not Nigerian, It shows he has received significant coverage outside of Nigeria [[2]] [[3]] [[4]][[5]][[6]][[7]] the article needs improvement and not deletions197.150.98.87 (talk) 23:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Junk. First one is written by "Freelancer" and the about page says "Due to the number of articles and photographs shared by contributors, Chiang Rai Times cannot verify all the content of the articles or photographs." If there was any doubt, there is none now. The whole thing is just spam. The article creator should be blocked for UPE and all their articles summarily deleted. Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Please, KH-1 can the article nominations be withdrawn and move the article to draft, so I can have enough time to work on it and summit it through AFC for approval, I would have summited the earlier one move to draft for approval but I don't know the template to put on it so it will be summited for review, please if possible help to move the article to draft let's me work on it from there.And also assist by putting the template on it so it will be easy for me to summit for review if I am able to find more sources. And I still don't have issues if the article is deleted and for me to be allowed to work on the one currently on draft but will kindly need an assistance for an editor to put the template for me to summit once I'm able to get more sources while working on it through AFC.. Thank you Fmnoble (talk) 16:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.